<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why aren&#8217;t UM leaders supporting the Manhattan Declaration?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://methodistthinker.com/2009/12/22/why-arent-um-leaders-supporting-the-manhattan-declaration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://methodistthinker.com/2009/12/22/why-arent-um-leaders-supporting-the-manhattan-declaration/</link>
	<description>News, commentary, source documents, podcasts, history, prayers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:04:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bishop Timothy Whitaker: United Methodists must stand against &#8216;violence of abortion&#8217; &#171; MethodistThinker.com</title>
		<link>http://methodistthinker.com/2009/12/22/why-arent-um-leaders-supporting-the-manhattan-declaration/#comment-18307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bishop Timothy Whitaker: United Methodists must stand against &#8216;violence of abortion&#8217; &#171; MethodistThinker.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methodistthinker.com/?p=9999#comment-18307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Why aren’t UM leaders supporting the Manhattan Declaration? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why aren’t UM leaders supporting the Manhattan Declaration? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. &#38; Mrs. KL Martindale</title>
		<link>http://methodistthinker.com/2009/12/22/why-arent-um-leaders-supporting-the-manhattan-declaration/#comment-10238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. &#38; Mrs. KL Martindale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 02:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methodistthinker.com/?p=9999#comment-10238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We were shocked and disappointed when learning of the UMC leadership supporting of the March 21, 2010 passage of the health care bill. 

We are again shocked and disappointed that UM leaders are not in support of the Manhattan Declaration. They seem to support same sex marriages, the murder of unborn children and the use of church tithes to promote a Marxist takeover of American Churches.

I was raised in the Methodist church. I am now 66 Years old. I am no longer attending a United Methodist church. We are now attending a Southern Baptist church and plan to resign our membership in the UMC. It is my opinion that continue following the UMC bishops would be a unholy sin.

God, please bless America.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were shocked and disappointed when learning of the UMC leadership supporting of the March 21, 2010 passage of the health care bill. </p>
<p>We are again shocked and disappointed that UM leaders are not in support of the Manhattan Declaration. They seem to support same sex marriages, the murder of unborn children and the use of church tithes to promote a Marxist takeover of American Churches.</p>
<p>I was raised in the Methodist church. I am now 66 Years old. I am no longer attending a United Methodist church. We are now attending a Southern Baptist church and plan to resign our membership in the UMC. It is my opinion that continue following the UMC bishops would be a unholy sin.</p>
<p>God, please bless America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Hughes</title>
		<link>http://methodistthinker.com/2009/12/22/why-arent-um-leaders-supporting-the-manhattan-declaration/#comment-8338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hughes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 05:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methodistthinker.com/?p=9999#comment-8338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am revoking my membership in the UMC, whose Social Principles are fraught with socialistic and Marxist tenets. I do not believe the Social Principles are aligned with Scripture (well, about 80% of it anyhow). Why don&#039;t we focus on &lt;em&gt;Christian&lt;/em&gt; principles instead?

I am outraged that my monetary donations have been used to support politics, lobbying, and a left-wing agenda to &quot;transform&quot; what is already greatest nation on earth. The UMC will not receive one more cent from my wallet.

God bless to my UMC family. I&#039;m outta here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am revoking my membership in the UMC, whose Social Principles are fraught with socialistic and Marxist tenets. I do not believe the Social Principles are aligned with Scripture (well, about 80% of it anyhow). Why don&#8217;t we focus on <em>Christian</em> principles instead?</p>
<p>I am outraged that my monetary donations have been used to support politics, lobbying, and a left-wing agenda to &#8220;transform&#8221; what is already greatest nation on earth. The UMC will not receive one more cent from my wallet.</p>
<p>God bless to my UMC family. I&#8217;m outta here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeR</title>
		<link>http://methodistthinker.com/2009/12/22/why-arent-um-leaders-supporting-the-manhattan-declaration/#comment-8110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JoeR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methodistthinker.com/?p=9999#comment-8110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These issues in UMC caught my attention when I saw they were similar to ones I see in today&#039;s politics. I began forwarding articles like these to our pastor, often with personal comments. Except for one instance, I have received no feedback, nor have these issues been addressed in church or our publications.

I am a member of only 3 years, just a little shorter time from when I came back to Christ. My wife and I joined UMC together. We are both active in our church. I am so serious about Wesley&#039;s teachings that I bought a set of his writings.

Now I have become disillusioned with UMC, particularly the leadership. I just read Mike Tooley&#039;s book, &lt;em&gt;Taking Back the UMC&lt;/em&gt;. Even taken with a grain of salt, it is a serious criticism of who leads UMC.

And, without being judgmental towards any one individual, I would say many of our leaders need to seek repentance for many reasons.  And, need replaced.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These issues in UMC caught my attention when I saw they were similar to ones I see in today&#8217;s politics. I began forwarding articles like these to our pastor, often with personal comments. Except for one instance, I have received no feedback, nor have these issues been addressed in church or our publications.</p>
<p>I am a member of only 3 years, just a little shorter time from when I came back to Christ. My wife and I joined UMC together. We are both active in our church. I am so serious about Wesley&#8217;s teachings that I bought a set of his writings.</p>
<p>Now I have become disillusioned with UMC, particularly the leadership. I just read Mike Tooley&#8217;s book, <em>Taking Back the UMC</em>. Even taken with a grain of salt, it is a serious criticism of who leads UMC.</p>
<p>And, without being judgmental towards any one individual, I would say many of our leaders need to seek repentance for many reasons.  And, need replaced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Jack Ford</title>
		<link>http://methodistthinker.com/2009/12/22/why-arent-um-leaders-supporting-the-manhattan-declaration/#comment-5096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Jack Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 14:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methodistthinker.com/?p=9999#comment-5096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am in full support of this declaration.

I wonder how many other Christian denominations and leaders are willing to take a stand. I&#039;m afraid the Church is spreading a social gospel instead of a &quot;repentant&quot; one as Wesley preached.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in full support of this declaration.</p>
<p>I wonder how many other Christian denominations and leaders are willing to take a stand. I&#8217;m afraid the Church is spreading a social gospel instead of a &#8220;repentant&#8221; one as Wesley preached.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://methodistthinker.com/2009/12/22/why-arent-um-leaders-supporting-the-manhattan-declaration/#comment-5045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 15:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methodistthinker.com/?p=9999#comment-5045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I&#039;m no bishop or agency chair, but I do support the Manhattan Declaration (I actually finally read it yesterday) and hope that more people will read and carefully consider its contents. 
 
I know that our Social Principles also support the dignity of the human individual and call for true freedom of conscience and religion (as does the declaration); our Social Principles support &quot;laws in civil society that define marriage as the union of one man and one woman&quot; (as does the declaration); and our Social Principles call for a respect of the sanctity of the lives of unborn babies — and also of their mothers (as does the declaration). 

So it seems to me a no-brainer that the UM leadership should support this declaration. I wonder what they would say if asked why they haven&#039;t?  

It also seems to me that the UM General Board of Church and Society tends to lobby very selectively for the Social Principles — that is, they lobby for climate stewardship or fighting poverty in keeping with our Social Principles; but they don&#039;t seem to do much lobbying to ban partial-birth abortion or to support laws that define marriage as a union between one man and one woman (both of which are supported by our Social Principles). That is, those Social Principles that align with the principles of the political Left are supported by Church and Society in their lobbying, while those that align with the political Center or Right are apparently ignored.

This is a great scandal, but no one (i.e., among bishops and other leaders) seems to be calling them out on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m no bishop or agency chair, but I do support the Manhattan Declaration (I actually finally read it yesterday) and hope that more people will read and carefully consider its contents. </p>
<p>I know that our Social Principles also support the dignity of the human individual and call for true freedom of conscience and religion (as does the declaration); our Social Principles support &#8220;laws in civil society that define marriage as the union of one man and one woman&#8221; (as does the declaration); and our Social Principles call for a respect of the sanctity of the lives of unborn babies — and also of their mothers (as does the declaration). </p>
<p>So it seems to me a no-brainer that the UM leadership should support this declaration. I wonder what they would say if asked why they haven&#8217;t?  </p>
<p>It also seems to me that the UM General Board of Church and Society tends to lobby very selectively for the Social Principles — that is, they lobby for climate stewardship or fighting poverty in keeping with our Social Principles; but they don&#8217;t seem to do much lobbying to ban partial-birth abortion or to support laws that define marriage as a union between one man and one woman (both of which are supported by our Social Principles). That is, those Social Principles that align with the principles of the political Left are supported by Church and Society in their lobbying, while those that align with the political Center or Right are apparently ignored.</p>
<p>This is a great scandal, but no one (i.e., among bishops and other leaders) seems to be calling them out on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://methodistthinker.com/2009/12/22/why-arent-um-leaders-supporting-the-manhattan-declaration/#comment-4889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methodistthinker.com/?p=9999#comment-4889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many UM leaders, particularly the Council of Bishops, and, predictably, the General Board of Church and Society, are not supporting the Manhattan Declaration because they have cavalierly replaced traditional Christian tenets with modern leftist political ideology. Their politics has become their &lt;em&gt;de facto&lt;/em&gt; religion. They have become so entrenched in ideology that they are unable to step back and view the situation objectively. It&#039;s that simple.  

These UM leaders should be replaced or they will continue to drag this denomination into the relativistic sewer it has been descending into for the past 40 years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many UM leaders, particularly the Council of Bishops, and, predictably, the General Board of Church and Society, are not supporting the Manhattan Declaration because they have cavalierly replaced traditional Christian tenets with modern leftist political ideology. Their politics has become their <em>de facto</em> religion. They have become so entrenched in ideology that they are unable to step back and view the situation objectively. It&#8217;s that simple.  </p>
<p>These UM leaders should be replaced or they will continue to drag this denomination into the relativistic sewer it has been descending into for the past 40 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

