Following feedback from the president of the Council of Bishops, the United Methodist News Service has deleted a story released earlier this week and replaced it with a revised version, but not before the earlier version became the basis of a Religion News Service account published by USA Today and other newspapers.
The earlier account, which reported that annual conferences in the U.S. had “defeated” 23 proposed amendments to the UM Constitution aimed at restructuring the United Methodist Church into a collection of “regional” conferences, apparently failed give sufficient weight to the fact that members of some non-U.S. annual conferences have yet to cast their votes.

Original version at left; revised version at right
The lead paragraph of the earlier version reported that “United Methodists across the United States have defeated 23 proposed amendments that would have paved the way to make the church in the U.S. a regional body.”
The lead paragraph of the revised version reports instead that “United Methodists in the U.S. have largely voted against 23 proposed amendments that would change the structure of the church, but voting is ongoing in Africa, Europe and the Philippines.”
In an e-mail advisory issued on July 30, the news service said that Bishop Gregory Palmer, president of the UM Council of Bishops, had “note[d] the council office where the reports are being sent has not done any tally at this point and will not be doing any until the receipt of all conference reports.” (That same wording is included in the revised story.)
The revised UMNS account also reports that the worldwide vote will not be certified and announced by the Council of Bishops until next spring. During the 2009 session of the North Georgia Annual Conference, Bishop Mike Watson had said that certification and the announcement of results likely would occur at the Council of Bishops gathering this fall.
∞
Even though some non-U.S. conference have not completed the voting process, the United Methodist renewal group, Good News, has projected — based on voting totals already announced — that the restructuring amendments will fail.
Good News also has projected the defeat of Amendment I, which would have altered language in the UM Constitution related to membership.
In a July 17 web posting, Good News noted that 50 U.S. conferences, “representing at least 88% of the total votes cast in the [United States] and approximately 82% of the votes worldwide, have publicly shared with all United Methodists their vote tallies on the proposed amendments.”
The already published votes, Good News concluded, indicate that not enough votes remain among potential votes from conferences outside the U.S., even when added to non-published U.S. votes, to change the “No” outcome for either the restructuring amendments or Amendment I.
∞
Below is a list of all 135 UMC annual conferences. If a conference name has a link assigned, click the link to see the results from that conference’s vote on the proposed constitutional amendments. (If you know of web-published results not linked below, please e-mail the URL to MethodistThinker.com.)
A one-page spreadsheet with tallies of all the published results for Amendment I and the five main restructuring amendments — IV, X, XIII, XXIII, and XXVI — is here (PDF).
| Alabama-West Florida (PDF) Alaska Arkansas Austria Provisional Baltimore-Washington Bicol Philippines Provisional Bulacan Philippines Bulgaria Provisional California-Nevada (PDF) California-Pacific Central Congo Central Luzon Central Pennsylvania (PDF) Central Texas Central Russia Cote d’Ivoire Czech & Slovak Republics Dakotas (PDF, p. 4) Denmark Desert Southwest (PDF) Detroit East Africa East Congo East Germany East Mindanao Philippines East Ohio (PDF) East Zimbabwe Eastern Angola Eastern Pennsylvania Eastern Russia & Kazakhstan Prov Estonia Finland-Finnish Provisional Finland-Swedish Provisional Florida Greater New Jersey Gwaten Nigeria Holston Hungary Provisional Illinois Great Rivers Indiana (PDF) Iowa (PDF, p. 2) Kansas East Kansas West Kasai Provisional Kentucky Kivu Provisional Liberia Louisiana Lukoshi Malawi Provisional Memphis Middle Philippines Mindanao Philippines Minnesota Mississippi (PDF) Missouri Mozambique North Mozambique South Nebraska (PDF) New England New Mexico New York North Alabama North Carolina (PDF) North Central New York North Central Philippines North Georgia North Germany |
North Katanga North Texas (PDF) Northeast Luzon Philippines Northeast Philippines Northern Illinois Northern Philippines North-West Katanga Northwest Mindanao Philippines Northwest Philippines Northwest Russia Provisional Northwest Texas Norway Oklahoma (amendment #’s not consistent w/ other conferences) Oklahoma Indian Missionary Oregon-Idaho (PDF, p. 16) Oriental & Equator Pacific Northwest (PDF) Palawan Philippines Pampango Philippines Pangasinan Philippines Peninsula-Delaware Pero Nigeria Philippines Philippines-Cavite Philippines East Poland Quezon City Philippines East Red Bird Missionary Rio Grande (PDF) Rocky Mountain Serbia/Macedonia Provisional Sierra Leone South Africa Provisional South Carolina South Congo South Georgia (PDF) South Germany Southern Nigeria Southern Russia Provisional Southern Tagalog Provisional South-West Katanga Southwest Philippines Provisional Southwest Texas Sweden Switzerland-France Tanganyika/Tanzania Tarlac Philippines Tennessee Texas Troy Ukraine & Moldova Provisional Virginia Visayas Philippines West Congo West Michigan West Middle Philippines West Ohio West Virginia (PDF, p. 3) West Zimbabwe Western Angola Western New York Western North Carolina (PDF) Western Pennsylvania (Excel) Wisconsin (PDF) Wyoming Yellowstone (PDF) Zambia Provisional |
Related posts |
|
| • | Good News projects defeat of controversial amendments |
| • | Bill Bouknight: Methodists are saying ‘No’ to their leaders |
| • | North Georgia overwhelmingly disapproves restructuring amendments |
| • | Ed Tomlinson: Proposed amendments would ‘decimate connectionalism’ |
| • | Maxie Dunnam, Eddie Fox release videos on proposed amendments |
| • | African UM leader on amendments: ‘We should have been consulted’ |
| • | A ‘procedural’ argument against Amendment I |
Related articles and information |
|
| • | Full text of all 32 amendments, showing how each would alter the current language of the United Methodist Book of Discipline—material stricken through would be deleted; material in bold/blue would be added (PDF) |
| • | We Confess newsletter (PDF) | Confessing Movement (May/June 2009) |
| • | Worldwide decision: United Methodists to vote on amending constitution | Bill Fentum, UM Reporter (April 10, 2009) |
| • | Which way to a Worldwide Church? (PDF) | Andrew Thompson, Gen-X Rising blog (May 31, 2009) |
| • | A rationale to oppose proposed constitutional changes | Tim McClendon, Columbia District Superintendent, South Carolina Conference |
| • | The worldwide Methodist movement | Eddie Fox, Interpreter Magazine (Web-only article—March 31, 2009) |
| • | Conferences to consider church structure | Linda Green, United Methodist News Service (March 10, 2009) |
| • | Amendment I (without the baggage) (PDF) | Andrew Thompson, Gen-X Rising blog (May 18, 2009) |
| • | United Methodism in crisis: Scriptural renewal through the Good News Movement | Chapter 4 of Public Pulpits: Methodists and Mainline Churches in the Moral Argument of Public Life by Steven M. Tipton (University of Chicago Press, 2008 — via Google Books) |
| • | 40 years of vision for United Methodist reformation and renewal (PDF) | James V. Heidinger II, Good News (November/December 2007) |
